<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>josh premuda &#187; competition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joshpremuda.com/tag/competition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joshpremuda.com</link>
	<description>Actively Curating Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:48:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Confidence of Mark Zuckerberg</title>
		<link>http://joshpremuda.com/2011/05/26/confidence-of-mark-zuckerberg/</link>
		<comments>http://joshpremuda.com/2011/05/26/confidence-of-mark-zuckerberg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 13:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshpremuda.com/?p=1048375265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love the hubris in this statement. Given our track record so far, I have confidence that we have a good shot at winning whenever it makes sense for us to enter.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/11_21/b4229050473695_page_6.htm">hubris in this statement</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>Given our track record so far, I have confidence that we have a good shot at winning whenever it makes sense for us to enter.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://joshpremuda.com/2011/05/26/confidence-of-mark-zuckerberg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blake Griffin on Competition</title>
		<link>http://joshpremuda.com/2011/01/03/blake-griffin-on-competition/</link>
		<comments>http://joshpremuda.com/2011/01/03/blake-griffin-on-competition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 21:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshpremuda.com/?p=1048361641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The competitor to be feared the most is one who never worries about others but goes on making themselves better all the time. —Blake Griffin]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<div>The competitor to be feared the most is one who never worries about others but goes on making themselves better all the time.</div>
</blockquote>
<div style="text-align: right;">—<em><a href="http://secondsminuteshours.tumblr.com/post/2501016839" target="_blank">Blake Griffin</a></em></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://joshpremuda.com/2011/01/03/blake-griffin-on-competition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are you the MF-er of your team?</title>
		<link>http://joshpremuda.com/2010/06/09/are-you-the-mf-er-of-your-team/</link>
		<comments>http://joshpremuda.com/2010/06/09/are-you-the-mf-er-of-your-team/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 11:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[basketball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael jordan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshpremuda.com/?p=4288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From David Halberstam&#8217;s book A March to Madness: A View from the Floor in the Atlantic Coast Conference: Every team needs a motherfucker, someone who is tough and mean and willing to do anything to win. That can mean getting in the other team’s face or getting in the face of a teammate if necessary. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ben.casnocha.com/2008/06/are-you-your-te.html">From</a> David Halberstam&#8217;s book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/March-Madness-Floor-Atlantic-Conference/dp/0316277126/complainandresol">A  March to Madness: A View from the Floor in the Atlantic Coast  Conference</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Every team needs a  motherfucker, someone who is tough and mean and willing to do anything  to win. That can mean getting in the other team’s face or getting in the  face of a teammate if necessary. Michael Jordan was a motherfucker,  even if his college coach wouldn’t use the term.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://joshpremuda.com/2010/06/09/are-you-the-mf-er-of-your-team/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Athletic Challenges</title>
		<link>http://joshpremuda.com/2009/09/17/athletic-challenges/</link>
		<comments>http://joshpremuda.com/2009/09/17/athletic-challenges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[my ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshpremuda.com/?p=1514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, there has been a couple instances (Shaq Vs and ifthisguycandunk.com) where a person takes on an athletic challenge to see if he/she is up to the task. I love this concept and have definitely spent plenty of time challenging friends and/or watching friends complete in different athletic feats (with a bet usually taking place). [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, there has been a couple instances (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaq_Vs.">Shaq Vs</a> and <a href="http://www.ifthisguycandunk.com/">ifthisguycandunk.com</a>) where a person takes on an athletic challenge to see if he/she is up to the task. I love this concept and have definitely spent plenty of time challenging friends and/or watching friends complete in different athletic feats (with a bet usually taking place).</p>
<p>Now, here&#8217;s my idea&#8230;what if there was a website to document these challenges, manage a bet and (un)prove that different athletic feats can(&#8216;t) be achieved. I&#8217;m pretty sure there is a site that already exists for managing bets of people (person-to-person).</p>
<p>Anyway, with ifthisguycandunk.com, I love how he is documenting the journey of his to dunk a basketball by his 30th birthday. So, my idea includes people throwing up challenges and people can accept them and work towards completing them.</p>
<p>For example, I&#8217;ve always wanted to run a marathon, however, my motivation to train for one is not the best. So, if someone were to challenge/bet me, I&#8217;d be very motivated not to lose. I could document my training (likely getting sponsors, nutritionists, etc to help along the way and help publicize them) and have the &#8220;put up or shut up&#8221; moment for the challenge.</p>
<p>Help me hammer this idea out in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://joshpremuda.com/2009/09/17/athletic-challenges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David vs Goliath</title>
		<link>http://joshpremuda.com/2009/05/22/david-vs-goliath/</link>
		<comments>http://joshpremuda.com/2009/05/22/david-vs-goliath/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 20:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malcolm gladwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshpremuda.com/?p=720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Malcom Gladwell delves into how underdogs can better compete with the favorites. While an interesting read, I pulled a couple selections that emphasize strategies that are based on very simple goals while remove all pre-existing notions and re-thinking the way things should be(have). Ranadivé views this move from batch to real time as a sort [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://joshpremuda.com/tag/malcom-gladwell">Malcom Gladwell</a> delves into <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/05/11/090511fa_fact_gladwell?printable=true">how underdogs can better compete with the favorites</a>. While an interesting read, I pulled a couple selections that emphasize strategies that are based on very simple goals while remove all pre-existing notions and re-thinking the way things should be(have).</p>
<blockquote><p>Ranadivé views this move from batch to real time as a sort of holy mission. The shift, to his mind, is one of kind, not just of degree. “We’ve been working with some airlines,” he said. “You know, when you get on a plane and your bag doesn’t, they actually know right away that it’s not there. But no one tells you, and a big part of that is that they don’t have all their information in one place. There are passenger systems that know where the passenger is. There are aircraft and maintenance systems that track where the plane is and what kind of shape it’s in. Then, there are baggage systems and ticketing systems—and they’re all separate. So you land, you wait at the baggage terminal, and it doesn’t show up.” Everything bad that happens in that scenario, Ranadivé maintains, happens because of the lag between the event (the luggage doesn’t make it onto the plane) and the response (the airline tells you that your luggage didn’t make the plane). The lag is why you’re angry. The lag is why you had to wait, fruitlessly, at baggage claim. The lag is why you vow never to fly that airline again. Put all the databases together, and there’s no lag. “What we can do is send you a text message the moment we know your bag didn’t make it,” Ranadivé said, “telling you we’ll ship it to your house.”</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>A few years ago, Ranadivé wrote a paper arguing that even the Federal Reserve ought to make its decisions in real time—not once every month or two. “Everything in the world is now real time,” he said. “So when a certain type of shoe isn’t selling at your corner shop, it’s not six months before the guy in China finds out. It’s almost instantaneous, thanks to my software. The world runs in real time, but government runs in batch. Every few months, it adjusts. Its mission is to keep the temperature comfortable in the economy, and, if you were to do things the government’s way in your house, then every few months you’d turn the heater either on or off, overheating or underheating your house.” Ranadivé argued that we ought to put the economic data that the Fed uses into a big stream, and write a computer program that sifts through those data, the moment they are collected, and make immediate, incremental adjustments to interest rates and the money supply. “It can all be automated,” he said. “Look, we’ve had only one soft landing since the Second World War. Basically, we’ve got it wrong every single time.”</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>“We followed soccer strategy in practice,” Ranadivé said. “I would make them run and run and run. I couldn’t teach them skills in that short period of time, and so all we did was make sure they were fit and had some basic understanding of the game. That’s why attitude plays such a big role in this, because you’re going to get tired.”</p>
<p>Redwood City’s strategy was built around the two deadlines that all basketball teams must meet in order to advance the ball. The first is the inbounds pass. When one team scores, a player from the other team takes the ball out of bounds and has five seconds to pass it to a teammate on the court. If that deadline is missed, the ball goes to the other team. Usually, that’s not an issue, because teams don’t contest the inbounds pass. They run back to their own end. Redwood City did not. Each girl on the team closely shadowed her counterpart. When some teams play the press, the defender plays behind the offensive player she’s guarding, to impede her once she catches the ball. The Redwood City girls, by contrast, played in front of their opponents, to prevent them from catching the inbounds pass in the first place. And they didn’t guard the player throwing the ball in. Why bother? Ranadivé used that extra player as a floater, who could serve as a second defender against the other team’s best player. “Think about football,” Ranadivé said. “The quarterback can run with the ball. He has the whole field to throw to, and it’s still damned difficult to complete a pass.” Basketball was harder. A smaller court. A five-second deadline. A heavier, bigger ball. As often as not, the teams Redwood City was playing against simply couldn’t make the inbounds pass within the five-second limit. Or the inbounding player, panicked by the thought that her five seconds were about to be up, would throw the ball away. Or her pass would be intercepted by one of the Redwood City players. Ranadivé’s girls were maniacal.</p>
<p>The second deadline requires a team to advance the ball across mid-court, into its opponent’s end, within ten seconds, and if Redwood City’s opponents met the first deadline the girls would turn their attention to the second. They would descend on the girl who caught the inbounds pass and “trap” her. Anjali was the designated trapper. She’d sprint over and double-team the dribbler, stretching her long arms high and wide. Maybe she’d steal the ball. Maybe the other player would throw it away in a panic—or get bottled up and stalled, so that the ref would end up blowing the whistle. “When we first started out, no one knew how to play defense or anything,” Anjali said. “So my dad said the whole game long, ‘Your job is to guard someone and make sure they never get the ball on inbounds plays.’ It’s the best feeling in the world to steal the ball from someone. We would press and steal, and do that over and over again. It made people so nervous. There were teams that were a lot better than us, that had been playing a long time, and we would beat them.”</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://joshpremuda.com/2009/05/22/david-vs-goliath/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

